?

Log in

No account? Create an account
An odd-ball thought... - A Suburbs Boy Living a Country Life [Pete and Pam's pages (photos and some commentary)] [Pam's journal] [Our company] [My Flickr Photos] [Arisia]
November 21st, 2009
09:41 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
An odd-ball thought...
This has not actually happened to me--I'm just pondering it. Suppose I post work published under someone else's Creative Commons license with a non-commercial restriction. I post this work on a site hosted by a 3rd-party, such as a blogging service. When I post the content, the site is ad-free. Later on the site starts placing ads on the same page with the content I posted. Now, noone would argue that I personally had made commercial use of the content. Regardless, if I were the owner of that content and saw my content posted on a page with commercial advertisements, I might cry foul.

Does anyone have practical experience with this?

Current Mood: curiouscurious

(5 comments | Leave a comment)

Comments
 
From:mama_hogswatch
Date:November 22nd, 2009 11:52 am (UTC)
(Link)
[User Picture]
From:happypete
Date:November 22nd, 2009 04:01 pm (UTC)

Right...

(Link)
Many terms of service also, however, have the catch-all "we may change the terms of service at any time without notice" [or variants of the same].

As I ponder this, I guess it comes down to if something like this happens, you take the content down...as a licensee, though, I'd like to know that I was protected from liability beyond taking the content down if I could show that I had acted in good faith when originally exercising the terms of the license.

I don't see anything in the CC license that protects licensees--could be a reason to avoid using commons except on sites where you exercise complete control over the whole page [which leaves out sites like LiveJournal, where the account status of the reader drives whether ads appear on certain pages that might display my content, or FaceBook, which will always have ads somewhere on the page.

Is there a search engine exception? Is the excerpt of content displayed in Google search results guaranteed to always meet the "fair use" test, for example?
[User Picture]
From:awfief
Date:November 22nd, 2009 04:35 pm (UTC)

Re: Right...

(Link)
Well, lj and facebook ads don't benefit *me*, so I think that would be OK. The idea is that the author can't use it for their own financial gain, right? There's indirect gain, like ads on LJ instead of paying for an account, but AFAIK that's allowed.

So AFAICT there's no problem with re-using content on sites that *have* ads, the problem is if I put content on a site I fully own, then put something like Google Ads on every page (or an affiliate link to Amazon.com, or a donation button).....that's the problem.

Then again, I'm not a lawyer :)
[User Picture]
From:happypete
Date:November 22nd, 2009 04:56 pm (UTC)

Hmmm...

(Link)
Hmmmm.....I guess that it comes down to what constitutes commercial use...and I really don't know.
[User Picture]
From:owenthomas
Date:November 22nd, 2009 08:10 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I have extensive thoughts on this issue but will only share them if plied with turkey and pie.
Pete, Pam and Quinn's pages Powered by LiveJournal.com