The Arisia/S*P drama|
For those dialing in late, it was just discovered last week that the "terms and conditions" associated with the invitation of the creator of Something Positive (or S*P) to participate at Arisia had been left hanging and never resolved. The result was that Mr. Millholland believed that the convention was still working things out, and was planning to attend--while the Programming Division Head assumed that he was no longer interested in attending. Mr. Millholland posted a rather upset blog entry claiming that he had learned--second-hand--that he had been "disinvited," and that he wouldn't be attending. I'm vastly paraphrasing other's words here--hopefully this is a fair, if concise, summary.
Some fans--on both sides--took this quite personally. I was going to reply to one in particular, this comment, in which lizreay said: "What a jerk. Some people need an attitude adjustment. With a large wrench." After much consideration, I decided not to stoke the flames in anyone's journal but my own.
Here's what I wrote:
- Subject: Look in the mirror. Oh, hey! There's one!
- Do you think there's anyone in the world who feels worse about this than the people at Arisia responsible? If you have any doubt, read their own words, here and elsewhere.
“Before you speak, think -Is it necessary? Is it true? Is it kind? Will it hurt anyone? Will it improve on the silence?” --Sri Sathya Sai Baba
lizreay, it's really easy to sit behind your screen and talk about "attitude adjustment"--with "a large wrench," even. Yes, there was really poor execution on this. I can tell you sincerely--from my direct and personal experience with the dozens of Arisians I've known--that this contretemps didn't result from any "attitudinal misalignment."
I don't speak for the convention or the corporation; I speak only for myself. That said, when valid criticism of my favorite convention and the hard-working people who run it crosses the line and becomes a vituperative attack, I will stand up and make myself counted in opposition. If that makes me a "fanboy," then so be it. I'm a fanboy. You know what else I've always been a fan of? S*P. I'll never be a fan of self-righteous, thinly-veiled threats of violence.
I'm proud to have been a volunteer, a staffer, and a member of the corporation, and I will continue to do so.
Current Mood: aggravated
Tags: arisia, drama
Well, you can see my comments on the topic in arisia
. I don't feel like I'm even taking sides -- just observing what's being said on all sides.
And I gotta say, I've been irritated by programming this year myself, but this guy, talented though he may be, sounds like a big baby. I mean, if he wants to bitch someone out, let him bitch out the person who screwed up, but the idea that an entire organization sucks because one person made a mistake... whatever. As I noted, it doesn't seem like a coincidence that he has a long list of cons with which he has problems.Edited at 2007-12-30 03:44 am (UTC)
Well in fairness the guy who apparently should be bitched out *is* a division head. He's acting on Arisia's behalf, so Arisia is responsible for the fix he puts them in.
Legally speaking (and morally too imho), an entity is generally responsible for the acts it's employees/members/agents take on its behalf. For ex; A gas station is responsible if the attendant puts gas in your diesel engine's fuel tank, but not if the guy decides to rob you. That has nothing to do with his job.
Once Arisia says, "He did it. We didn't know he did it. We're sorry. We're taking appropriate steps", then yeah, you've got a point, but until that happens, the assumption that it *is* Arisia is the only fair one to make. Arisia can choose to distance itself from the actions it's DivisionHead took by saying they were inappropriate, or take it's medicine.
FWIW. I'd be just as pissed. It's a hell of a thing to find out, especially after the Not-Just-Another-Con Bob Sawyer mess.
Edited at 2007-12-30 08:13 am (UTC)
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 12:23 am (UTC)|| |
wow. good word.
(note to self keep Hp on my side)
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 01:40 pm (UTC)|| |
there's blame enough to go around on both sides...
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 01:54 pm (UTC)|| |
An example of what I think might have been a far more effective approach...
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 04:38 pm (UTC)|| |
Re: An example of what I think might have been a far more effective approach...
|Date:||December 31st, 2007 01:23 am (UTC)|| |
Part of the problem...
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 01:16 am (UTC)|| |
I did? And what play was this?
It was a bureaucratic snafu at one point. The problem is it snowballs when Mr. Whitehouse chose NOT to address the problem after he realized it existed and swept it under the rug. Another problem arose when it turned out he was doing all communications through a personal email address, a large "no no" for Arisia (all emails are supposed to be done via Arisia email accounts for accountability - basically to prevent things like this).
There's a lot more to it, obviously. And every story has two sides and the real answer is usually somewhere nicely inbetween. That said, I'm saddened that the original poster of this discussion took his fight only to her personal LJ more than his and the other Arisia fans' interpretation of events (a few of which have been quite creative).
|Date:||January 17th, 2008 05:15 pm (UTC)|| |
|Date:||January 17th, 2008 06:48 pm (UTC)|| |
all is well, indeed...
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 01:39 pm (UTC)|| |
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 01:44 pm (UTC)|| |
Noel, Noel, Noel...
...trust me. It's a lot of fun. I have been there, eight years running.
As I would think you would know from the Poly community, there are a lot of people who get off on spreading the negative.
People without direct first-hand experience make lovely targets for this sort of rumor-mongering.
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 02:05 pm (UTC)|| |
|Date:||December 30th, 2007 04:33 pm (UTC)|| |
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 08:10 pm (UTC)|| |
what can I say...
|Date:||January 7th, 2008 04:26 am (UTC)|| |
I've only been to Arisia a couple of times (and not recently), but I always enjoyed it.
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 01:11 am (UTC)|| |
How come you didn't have the bravery to post this reply to the actual person who posted it?
Seriously, if you honestly believe this, you should have said it to the person in question instead of retreating to your personal LiveJournal for the chorus of, "YOU SURE TOLD THEM!" Or did you post it and delete it quickly for fear of retribution?
I'm pretty disappointed by this. Not that you feel this way - you've every right to do so. I'm saddened that your course of action is to say it only to your friends instead of proudly speaking out and defending this thing you love so dearly - and then you followed it up with a catty, passive aggressive post in my comic's public feed.
Aside from the fact you've either not seen or chosen to ignore all the facts in the incident, all it says is you're brave behind closed doors - where it doesn't count.
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 01:19 am (UTC)|| |
Actually, I just remembered that I didn't turn off emailing comments on that post in my LiveJournal. I double-checked and I don't have ANY copy of this magical retort you posted to the user in question.
So basically, you're just telling your friends how you went off on someone for acting brave behind a screen - while acting brave behind a screen.
|Date:||January 1st, 2008 03:15 am (UTC)|| |
Think what you want.
If I wanted to be behind a screen, I would have friends-locked this post.
I don't need to explain any further. The reason I posted it here is exactly what I said: the fires had been stoked a-plenty on this issue. I had no intent on engaging "wrench-wielding" partisans in someone else's "house."
I didn't "post this retort." I composed it and then deliberately chose not to post it there. Perhaps you misunderstood me when I posted, "i was going to reply." [emphasis added].
Given everything I've read--on both sides--I think my summary is accurate, if greatly abbreviated. Additional complications--like Mr. Whitehouse's role working for another convention--are certainly germane, but basically just add to the central point that wires got badly crossed.
If anyone should be ashamed, it's you. You could have taken the high road here--and it would, I believe, have been to your ultimate benefit. Instead, you chose the route of the public tantrum.
I hope it at least made you feel better.
I gotta echo what pete said in response to this.
Yeah, Arisia screwed up. I've flamed them as bad as anyone given what happened to Robert Sawyer last year in Chicago, This. Just. Should. Not. Happen. Arisia's only appropriate reaction is one of egg on face. I agree with that position. I'll defend you on that.
But seriously, if you feel the need to come to random Arisia attendee's LJ's to make your point, I cannot help but wonder what Arisia could do to make you happy.
Please tell what exactly Arisia could do to fix this?
If there isn't anything they can do at this point, why are you wasting any more of your breath on it?